Sunday, March 29, 2009

HP vs Twilight

I am a avid Harry Potter- er.
I have resently read 1 1/3 of the Twilight series books.
I have compared the two.
Twilight is terrible.
I couldn't make it past the 2nd book.
It has a horrible plot and it is a discrase (spelled wrong) to all literature.
Harry Potter actually has meaning ,teaches life lessons, and has all of what a good book needs.
When I was reading and I saw (imagined in my head) Dumbledore' s death and my frenids and I all cried for him.
When Bella was being beaten, I laughed.
Laughter in a dramtic moment of a book means that it was not written well.
Now don't get me started on the Twiligh movie.
The girl who played Bella sounds like a robot!
They got the movie completely wrong from the book.
Yes , the Potter movies has its flaws (5th movie) but if critcs look at it from a movie point of view then it is adaquite (spelled wrong).
I can work up a whole debate about my positon on this.
However, I have tried this and all of the Twilight fans has just yelled at me and walked away saying WELL EDWARD IS HOT TAKE THAT!
Lots of people in Harry Potter are "hot" too.
I mean Voldemort he just sends a chill threw my neurons!
Lastly, I know that there are other great movies to books that are better than Twilight.
So, I can still argue about those books. GO NARNIA AND LOTR!
But the main debate are with these too for some reason?
I'm just saying as my last point.
J.K. Rowling transformed a whole generation onto reading and has made millions off of it.
She is one of the most powerful people in the world.
What has Twilight done for the youth of the world?
Corrupted them into horrible themes that do nothing for them.
Teens should run away from there parents for love?
No! Thats a horrible meaning!

-Plus who wants to be a vampire anyway? What powers do they have , except to kill?
I would SOoooo want to be like win-gar-dreum-leeve-o-sa and get things without getting up!-